A Nairobi experiment in using low cost air quality monitors

  • P deSouza Research Fellow, Senseable City Lab MIT, Cambridge MA 02139
  • V Nthusi Science Division, United Nations Environment Program(UNEP), UN Avenue, Nairobi, Kenya
  • J.K Klopp Center for Sustainable Urban Development, Earth Institute, Columbia University, 475 Riverside Dr. Suite 520 New York NY 10115
  • b.e Shaw Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, Palisades, New York, USA
  • W.O Ho Senior Research Scientist, Alphasense Ltd, Sensor Technology House, 300 Avenue West, Skyline 120, Great Notley, Essex CM77 7AA, UK
  • J Saffell Technical Director, Alphasense Ltd, Sensor Technology House, 300 Avenue West, Skyline 120, Great Notley, Essex CM77 7AA, UK
  • R Jones University of Cambridge, UK
  • C Ratti Director, Senseable City Lab MIT, Cambridge MA 02139

Abstract

Many African cities have growing air quality problems, but few have air quality monitoring systems in place. Low cost air quality sensors have the potential to bridge this data gap. This study describes the experimental deployment of six low cost air quality monitors consisting of an optical particle counter Alphasense OPC-N2 for measuring PM1, PM2.5 and PM10, and Alphasense A-series electrochemical (amperometric) gas sensors: NO2-A43F, SO2-A4, NO-A4 for measuring NO2, NO and SO2 in four schools, the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) headquarters and a community center in Nairobi. The monitors were deployed on May 1 2016 and are still logging data. This paper analyses the data from May 1 2016 to Jan 11 2017. By examining the data produced by these sensors, we illustrate the strengths, as well as the technical limitations of using low cost sensors for monitoring air quality. We show that despite technical limitations, sensors can provide indicative measurements of air quality that are valuable to local communities. It was also found that such a sensor network can play an important role in engaging citizens by raising awareness about the importance of addressing poor air quality. We conclude that these sensors are clearly a potentially important complement but not a substitute for high quality and reliable air quality monitoring systems as problems of calibration, certification, quality control and reporting remain to be solved

Views
  • Abstract 189
  • PDF 28
Views and downloads are with effect from 11 January 2018
Published
2019-09-04
Section
Research Article